Corporate restructuring is a plan to change a corporation’s structure, operations, or management. Corporate restructuring can be either voluntary or involuntary. Voluntary restructurings are initiated by the company itself and usually involve financial distress. Involuntary restructurings are ordered by courts under bankruptcy laws. India’s Ministry of Corporate Affairs defines the process as “a tool for reviving/saving sick units.”

A corporate restructuring differs from mergers and acquisitions because there is no sale of one business to another. It also differs from divestitures, which involve selling off parts of an organization.

Organizations initiate corporate restructurings when they feel they need to alter their capital structure or other aspects of their operations significantly in order to become competitive. The restructuring may be a reaction to a problem the company is facing or it may be an opportunity for the company.

The two most common reasons for corporate restructuring are financial distress and corporate growth. India’s Ministry of Corporate Affairs defines corporate restructuring as “a tool for reviving/saving sick units.” If the company has become unprofitable, it may need to restructure in order to minimize losses until better management can make it profitable again.

There are several types of business restructurings:

External factors that contribute to bankruptcy include poor market conditions, lack of liquidity, the negative response by creditors or customers with regard to the product(s) sold by the company, changes in operating expenses, loss in value of assets held by the corporation, and downfall in general economic conditions. India’s Ministry of Corporate Affairs defines corporate restructuring as “a tool for reviving/saving sick units.”

The following are some common responses to companies that are experiencing financial distress, according to India’s Ministry of Corporate Affairs:

  1. Reorganization under the Companies Act by way of Scheme of Arrangement or Amicable Settlement or Compromise with creditors, partners or contributors;
  2. Winding up / Closure under the Companies Act;
  3. Sanctioning a scheme under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC);
  4. Reconstruction by way of merger, demerger, or under section 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956;
  5. Issuing of new shares under section 72A and 72B of the Companies Act, 2013;
  6. Making fresh investments in the company under sections 186 and 187 of the Companies Act, 2013; and
  7. Reduction of capital or extinguishment or modification to rights attached to any class of share or debentures pursuant to provisions contained in Sections 124 and 282 of the Act. India’s Ministry of Corporate Affairs defines corporate restructuring as “a tool for reviving/saving sick units.”

What is Corporate Restructuring?

Businesses that are in serious financial trouble may be forced to restructure their operations. That could mean changing the company’s business model, selling off assets, or reworking the company mission statement. Restructuring can also involve cutting down on staff or creating new groups within the company to take over some of the work. A restructuring plan is designed to help get a business back on track and make it profitable again.

The goal of corporate restructuring is often to revive the company through change while mitigating losses for creditors and shareholders. It’s not just about making changes to capitalize on the current situation, but also about getting back on your feet so that you can continue moving forward with your prospects for success in mind.



This kind of rebuilding might occur because of an extreme fall in the general deals due to antagonistic monetary conditions. Here, the corporate substance might change its value design, obligation overhauling plan, value property, and cross-brief delay. This is done to support the market and the productivity of the organization.


Organizational Restructuring infers an adjustment of the organizational construction of an organization, like decreasing its level of the chain of importance, upgrading the work positions, scaling back the representatives, and changing the reporting connections. This sort of rebuilding is done to reduce down the expense and to take care of the remarkable obligation to proceed with the business tasks in some way.


Corporate rebuilding is carried out in the accompanying circumstances:


The administration of the troubled element endeavors to work on its performance by taking out specific divisions and auxiliaries which don’t line up with the core system of the organization. The division or auxiliaries may not seem to fit deliberately with the organization’s drawn-out vision. Hence, the corporate element chooses to zero in on its core methodology and discard such resources for the expected purchasers.


The endeavor may not be sufficient benefit-making to take care of the expense of capital of the organization and may cause financial misfortunes. The poor performance of the endeavor might be the aftereffect of an off-base choice taken by the administration to begin the division or the decrease in the productivity of the endeavor because of the adjustment of client needs or expanding costs.


This idea is as opposed to the standards of cooperative energy, where the worth of a combined unit is more than the worth of individual units by and large. According to invert cooperative energy, the worth of a singular unit might be more than the blended unit. This is one of the normal explanations behind stripping the resources of the organization. The concerned element might conclude that stripping a division to an outsider can bring more worth instead of claiming it.


Discarding a useless endeavor can give an extensive money inflow to the organization. On the off chance that the concerned corporate element is confronting some intricacy in acquiring finance, discarding a resource is a methodology to fund-raise and to pay off past commitments.

  • To work on the Balance Sheet of the organization (by disposing of the unrewarding division from its core business)
  • Staff decline (by closing down or unloading the unfruitful portion)
  • Changes in corporate organization
  • Disposing of the underutilized assets, similar to brands/patent rights.
  • Outsourcing its assignments, for instance, specific support and money the board to a more useful untouchable.
  • Shifting of exercises, for instance, moving of gathering assignments to less expensive regions.
  • Reorganizing limits like exhibiting, arrangements, and assignment.
  • Renegotiating labor arrangements to diminish overhead.
  • Rescheduling or reevaluating of commitment to restrict the interest portions.
  • Conducting a promoting effort wherever to reposition the organization with its buyers.


  • Legal and procedural issues
  • Accounting viewpoints
  • Human and Cultural collaborations
  • Valuation and financing
  • Taxation and Stamp commitment viewpoints
  • Competition viewpoints, etc


  1. MERGER –

This is the idea where two or more business substances are consolidated either via absorption or mixture or by forming another organization. The consolidation of two or more business elements is by and large done by the trading of protections between the securing and the objective organization.


Under this corporate rebuilding methodology, two or more organizations are joined into a solitary organization to get the advantage of cooperative energy emerging out of such a consolidation.


In this methodology, the unlisted public organizations have the opportunity to change over into a recorded public organization, without settling on IPO (Initial Public deal). In this procedure, the privately-owned business procures a majority shareholding in the public organization with its own name.


Right when a corporate component sells out or trades an asset or helper, it is known as “divestiture”.


Under this system, the procuring organization assumes generally liability for the objective organization. It is otherwise called the Acquisition.


Under this procedure, a substance is formed by two or more organizations to embrace monetary demonstration together. The element made is known as the Joint Venture. Both the gatherings consent to contribute in proportion as consented to form another element and furthermore share the costs, incomes, and control of the organization.


Under this technique, two or more substances go into a consent to collaborate with one another, to accomplish certain destinations while as yet going about as autonomous organizations.


Under this technique, a substance moves one or more endeavors for a single amount of thought. Under Slump Sale, an endeavor is sold for thought regardless of the singular upsides of the resources or liabilities of the endeavor.


India has always been a developing country and India is struggling to tackle the issue of corporate restructuring. India’s economy isn’t as strong as it should be, but there are some signs that India will eventually grow into an economic power in Asia. In light of this, India needs to develop its own legal system for Corporate Restructuring which doesn’t exist yet. India has borrowed legal systems from other countries, so India needs to develop its own Corporate Restructuring system.

You should also read this: What Is One Person Company And How To Register It?